<p>I know that I can't have my comments personalized, but here's my profile either way
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
841
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate
<p>Idk exactly what you mean, but this is my opinion. Keep all 3 pages (Big Dreams & Big Apples, Nanny In Miami and Austin & Jessie & Ally All Star New Year) with all their content on them, however, leave a "Main:..." thing (like what's done on character pages when relating to pairings or a "This page is specific to..." or something like on the "Austin & Ally page"
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
Oh. No one will ever be able to be excited for Season 4...
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>No prob =)
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Actually, anyone can make a userbox. It's a template, the standard userbox template looks like this:
</p>
</td><td>
</td><td style="font-size:12pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em;"><center>My favorite character is
Ally Dawson!</center> </td></tr></table>
{|cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="width:238px; background:; border:3px solid #F1B948;"
|style="width:45px; height:45px; background:#violet; text-align:center; font-size:14pt;"|[[File:220px-Ally season 2.jpg|120px]]||
|style="font-size:12pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em;"|<center>My favorite character is<br> '''[[Ally Dawson]]'''!</center>
|}
<p>And it'll look like this:
</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="width:238px; background:; border:3px solid #F1B948;"><tr><td style="width:45px; height:45px; background:#violet; text-align:center; font-size:14pt;">
</td><td>
</td><td style="font-size:12pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em;"><center>My favorite character isAlly Dawson!</center> </td></tr></table>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Isn't that just counter productive because when Season 4 <i>does</i> come out, another userbox will come out that will most likely also be called Season 4.
</p><p>You would have 2 userboxes which would be named.... wrongly/awkwardly because you would have two.
</p><p>Because you made this "excited or Season 4" userbox the code "Season 4", when Season 4 actually <i>does</i> come out, and someone makes a userbox which says "I love Season 4" or whatever, it won't be able to be named "Season 4" because the Excited for Season 4 would already be named Season 4 and if you rename the excited for Season 4 userbox then everyone'll get all mixed up because that wasn't the userbox that they wanted it to be.
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>If you're going o make one, can the code be different so people don't get mixed up?
</p><p>Like, you would probably assume that the code being called "Season 4" would probably mean that the userbox would say that they love season 4...
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Oh. Okay. SO it wasn't the actual picture that was the problem, it was the name...
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Well, actually <i>a lot</i> of pictures on here are irrelevant anyways. The only thing that's really <i>irrelevant</i> would be the way it's used (and the naming)
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Wait, how can you "take care of if?" Only admins have the ability to remove pictures and/or delete comments that are deemed irrelevant.
</p><p>The only thing AwesomeOrange could've done is leave a notice on HarryStylesLover's message wall.
</p><p>Also, I wouldn't necessarily consider it an "irrelevant picture" because we have a lot of those. It's the actual <i>naming</i> of the photo that's the problem.
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>AwesomeOrange89 wrote:
Hi! The images I saw were in fact irrelevant. The only image that is acceptable is the one on his page. I will warn him and put the canidate for deletion tag on soon. Next time please provide links. Thanks for the report!
</p>
</i></div>
<p>I'm not exactly sure where this picture is, but I'm pretty sure that <i>pictures</i> aren't irrelevant. You can post a picture about whatever you want to, as long as it's appropriate. There's irrelevant <i>commenting</i>, but not irrelevant <i>picture uploading</i>. </p><p>I may not know the context of this exactly, but unless that picture acted as a <i>comment</i>, otherwise you can't warn them AwesomeOrange. </p>
<p>I'm not exactly sure where this picture is, but I'm pretty sure that <i>pictures</i> aren't irrelevant. You can post a picture about whatever you want to, as long as it's appropriate. There's irrelevant <i>commenting</i>, but not irrelevant <i>picture uploading</i>. </p><p>I may not know the context of this exactly, but unless that picture acted as a <i>comment</i>, otherwise you can't warn them AwesomeOrange. </p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>No, but it's highly likely either way
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>You (if you applied for the job) probably got on it. If not, then unknown, probably that they're going to use your idea.
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>I have to agree. I mean, yes, we support differing opinions, but there's a very thin line between disagreements, arguments and fighting.
</p><p>Also, the page would be violate wiki Guideline #2 which states that: <i>Deliberately angering someone due to differing interests is known as trolling and this will not be accepted. For example, purposely trashing a group of people because they like a show that you don't like is considered trolling.</i>
</p><p>The page would also contradict wiki guideline #6 which states <i>Do not bring up any topics, ask any questions, etc. that may be uncomfortable, disturbing, or highly controversial for other users.</i>
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
Well... that seems like a lot of work when it'd be just fine if they just locked it for admins
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>I don't think that you can lock pages to accompany certain users. It's either:
</p>
- Admins only
- Users (who edit)
- Non Users (aka wiki contributors, but anonymous users are already disabled on here anyways)
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>I think that although he was part of Glee Clubs & Glory, he wasn't a character that ultimately decided the plot like Tilly Thompson or Demonica Dixon did.
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Click here to create a new wiki. After that, just go through the motions...
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>Well, it <i>will</i> be a wiki thing, it just has to be planned by you, AustinAndAllyFan. It'll still probably have a lot of users, just not this huge everyone's on there wiki promoted kinda thing.
</p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)
<p>You didn't, but you did say that AustinAndAllyFan couldn't have their Halloween party on that day. And again, I'll bring it up again, you said: <i>You can't on Oct. 25</i>, so that is easily implied that you're not <i>allowing</i> it on the 25th. I get that none of us are chat mods, you manage to bring the wiki's hierarchy into the situation whenever you can (BTW, A&ARocks 100 is a chat mod) if you don't agree with something, and you may want to argue me on this, but a lot of the times, when someone says that another person <i>can't</i> do something, it's pretty much saying that they aren't allowed on.
</p><p>
And you kind of did say that AustinAndAllyFan couldn't make a blog post. They asked: <i>Ok. And Yes I Do Want To Do The 25th. Can I Make A Blog For It Please?</i> and you answered <i>Not yet.</i>. I hate to be rude, but why would you even say that? Cole could make a blogpost whenever he wants, it's not to be determined by someone other than himself. </p><p>And also, just because it's hosted by a user does not mean that it will be completely denied by an admin. It is so rude of you to say that because the admin didn't plan it, then it'll be a complete bust by not having adequate mods (who are supposed to be on chat, because that's their <i>jobs</i>, and especially because they were notified of it), no background and no music. It may <i>not</i> have music or a cool background or whatever, but... seriously? </p>
And you kind of did say that AustinAndAllyFan couldn't make a blog post. They asked: <i>Ok. And Yes I Do Want To Do The 25th. Can I Make A Blog For It Please?</i> and you answered <i>Not yet.</i>. I hate to be rude, but why would you even say that? Cole could make a blogpost whenever he wants, it's not to be determined by someone other than himself. </p><p>And also, just because it's hosted by a user does not mean that it will be completely denied by an admin. It is so rude of you to say that because the admin didn't plan it, then it'll be a complete bust by not having adequate mods (who are supposed to be on chat, because that's their <i>jobs</i>, and especially because they were notified of it), no background and no music. It may <i>not</i> have music or a cool background or whatever, but... seriously? </p>
(Edited by Red Compassion, Red Love, Red Hate)