Board Thread:Administrators Discussion/@comment-4811793-20130620225343/@comment-4146635-20130622210638

3cooldog92 wrote: >I find it funny that popularity is an issue with this but it wasn't an issue when that stupid "no irrelevant comments" rule was concocted. Not to mention making your work harder just for the sake of working more is a waste. Working smarter is generally better than working harder. Plus isn't generally better to eliminate the source of a poison than to be constantly cleaning up its nasty effects?

Nope it wasn't because how much can the popularity go down with that rule. It's much easier to just go to chat or the forums instead of leaving when you find out you can't make an account. And you're not really getting what I'm saying. Yes, working smarter is a good choice. BUT, I'm not going to choose working smarter (with only benefits the admins) over helping the wiki (which benefits the entire community). And also, I'd really like to know what you have to say about my reply to your "anons do more bad than good" statement.

And remember everyone, why do you think so many anons tag their comments and posts with their name or nickname? They would have made an account already if they could have. So obviously there is a reason why they are not. And trust me, there are a lot of anons who do this.