Board Thread:Administrators Discussion/@comment-4811793-20130620225343/@comment-4146635-20130622202632

Selenaroxx wrote:

Alright, I am extremely tired of hearing people say, "Oh, it's a lost cause, you're wasting your time, etc." I'm not going to point fingers; you people know who you are. Because this is not a lost cause--at least, not yet. We still have 8 days (including today) to appeal enough to Wiki Staff enough to at least get a compromise. So please, if you're saying that you think all of this peaceful protesting is idiotic, then please just do something about it. I'm not going to tell you to go away and not speak your opinion; I'm just saying that I am extremely tired of it. -.- Exactly. I completely agree with everything Selenaroxx is saying. We are still going to put up a fight with this.

And like Sel said, people think that anons are always vandalizing. In my last reply I did explain my opinion on that but I do have more to say. So if anons are disabled, the vandalize rate drops. That'd be nice. BUT, if anons are disabled, the wiki will also loose popularity and many users. Vandalism is something that an admin must take care of. I'm not supporting disabling anons just to make my job as an admin easier. I'm not that kind of user. I will work as hard as I have to to take care of vandalism. But if disabling anons mean loosing popularity drastically on the wiki, then I'm voting against it. Some admins may get them disabled just to lower the vandalism rate, to make their job easier. But I'm thinking about the wiki here, not myself.