Board Thread:Administrators Discussion/@comment-4811793-20130620225343/@comment-4146635-20130623011421

3cooldog92 wrote: I've spent a large amount of time watching the RA pages of different wikis. Most activity of the anons I've seen are screw ups and vandalism. Have I seen good things come from them? Yes, but not enough to justify letting any idiot with access to a computer do what they want to the pages. 10% (at most) of the activity of anons is good and doesn't need fixing. 80% mess up in some way requiring me or someone else to fix their screw up. And the other 10% are just vandals out to cause problems.

Well obviously you haven't spent that time on this wiki because the admins and I, as well as many other users, are here almost everyday and we do not see those "screw ups" often.

3cooldog92 wrote: As for the question of disabling, hopefully staff will do what should have been done long ago since people here are too thick headed to listen to what I've been saying. It's funny because the other wikis don't seem to have a problem in comprehending this stuff. What staff is doing is for the good of the wiki whether you realize it or not right now.

Ok now you're really making me mad. First of all, Red had EVERY right to give you a warning. Did you see what you just said? You called people here thick headed. Well listen up #1 Don't you dare call anyone here anything like that again. Not only are they the users that make up the community of this beloved wiki but they are my friends and I will not tolerate it. #2 This is your last warning. Say it again and we will block you. And no one here is abusing any power.

And for your information, wikia is not doing this for the good of the wikis. If they were, it'd be on ALL wikis. They're doing this just to comply with the law.

This entire thing has just gone from a discussion of the upcoming changes to a dispute over anons to a fight. I suggest we return back to the whole reason why this thread has made.