Board Thread:Wiki Improvements/@comment-4146635-20131207205009/@comment-5384369-20140102181808

Okay, I understand a few of them, but some of them are kinda over exaggerated. Jessie1010 wrote: The vandalism is going to be very common as well as very hard to catch. Okay, well first of all we’ve had some transcripts for who knows how long, and not many people even go and edit them anyways (kudos to you DanTD). And also, is a few words are incorrect, that’s not necessarily “vandalism”. I go pages and I see spelling mistakes/word mistakes/grammar mistakes and who knows what else, and that’s not vandalism either. I mean, do you really think that some diabolical person will be like “Hahaha, I’m going to mess up the transcripts everyday so the whole wiki is screwed over!!!!” Yeah, no. SO it’s not going to be as often as you make it out to be.

Jessie1010 wrote: They can take up to a year to really be finished and we don't really have many users who actually edit them. Users cannot easily access the episode. Some pages haven’t been edited in who knows how long, or some of them have only like 5 edits. At least we have one person who edits it once in a while (thank you again, DanTD). And for the users who CAN’T access the episodes, isn’t that more of a reason to have them?

Jessie1010 wrote:
 * It causes a large amout of stub articles. If they’re finished, they’re no longer stubs. And really? How many transcripts do we actually have that aren’t finished? I know it’s not 50

I agree with some of your solutions, it make take some time, but doesn’t everything? Just because it poses a little risk and may increase the amount of stub articles (we already have about 30, and none of those are gone/finished) but I don’t think that just getting rid of them would really do anything other than erasing work that other people (DanTD, mainly) took time to work on.