Thread:AusllyRaura2014/@comment-5384369-20140913124214/@comment-5384369-20140914045154

AusllyRaura, I'm going to be a know-it-all here, but I will because it's in reason. You said I replied about 3 days later. For the first blog from Nutter's wiki pal, it was written on September 5th, and I wrote a reply on September 5th.... So, your few days is, in actuality, a few hours. And the exact same thing goes for his second blog and the recent racist blog post. I'm not saying it to be a jerk, but next time, at least get your facts straight.

Also, you should know that the last time the wiki chose an admin, the wiki held a whole interviewing process and everything, and it took a few months to do. Also, a lot of users can be deemed as "unqualified". Most users need to have at least 500 article edits to be even considered as an admin. Yes, that may have changed, from before, but it takes a lot more that being "active" to be an admin.

As for the "being on when you need them". Again, admins have lives. They get busy and they can't dedicate all their time to this wiki. I know that Jessie1010 tries to get on at least once a day, but sometimes he's not on when you need him. We don't ask you to constantly be on the wiki, so why ask the same thing from him? For example, you were gone for a few hours (based on your lack of replies), but I'm not going to immediately jump down your back because this was your message and you were supposed to handle it.

Also, read my first message. If you want to say something, than say something; but all I'm saying is that if you do, you may be breaking WIKI RULES. It is right on the page: General Policies; Behavior Policy; #5. You can read it if you want to.